Is hell real? One good way to answer the question
whether hell is real is to ask people who have actually been dead. People who
have been clinically dead and come back report having so-called near death
experiences where some do in fact report having distressing or direct “hellish
experiences.”
A Gallup
Poll in 1982 estimated that out of eight million Near Death Expriences (NDEs) in the U.S., only about 1
percent had an “unpleasant” experience. Some NDE researchers have come up with
the same number of about 1 percent but they have also openly admitted an
emphasis on pleasant or heaven-like experiences.
Researchers who have looked at unpleasant and hellish experiences within
the NDE have found about 15 percent. Researcher Margot Grey found a high rate
of 12 percent “hellish experiences” and Peter Fenwick found that 15 percent of
the people in his study had “moments of terror.”
Most
reliable according to statistical certainty would be P. M. H. Atwater’s large
sample of 3,000 NDEs. She found that out of 3,000 adult NDEs 15 percent had
“unpleasant experiences” whereof one third, 5 percent, had a hellish experience
where they described it as “truly hellish.” She also confirmed this number from
a smaller sample of 700 NDEs where she found 105 cases of unpleasant
experiences, which again makes it 15 percent.
Is there
proof of hell then? We could conclude that hell is real based on these
statistics and the fact that people do have unpleasant “hellish experiences” in
their NDE. However, in an ultimate sense the reality of hell is complex.
In her
article Is There a Hell, Atwater
concludes the following:
Is there
a hell? To one who thinks he or she has been there, the answer is yes. To a
person like myself, who has studied what evidence exists and has conducted
countless interviews, the answer is this: there is more to the near-death
experience than anyone currently knows. The phenomenon is vast in scope, its
implications more important and more dynamic than most people are willing to
admit. Heaven and hell may seem more conceptual than fact, but right now they
are all we have to go on as we search further afield into what the mind and its
mental imagery might reveal about the source of our being.
The fact that people do have unpleasant NDEs
with hellish experiences, does count as a proof that people do have experiences
of hell. However, as Atwater also tells us; hell (and heaven) may ultimately be
more a conceptual reality than an actual reality.
NDE research in general agrees with this
conclusion that we cannot take these “hellish experiences” as an absolute proof
of the dogmatic religious interpretation of hell. As we saw in the last two
chapters, the angry judgmental God of dogmatic religion does not exist in the
light of NDEs. To confirm that God is not angry in relation to hell, I also
asked about the following statement in my study: “God wants to punish us in hell.” Here in total rejection 100 percent
said that they disagreed with 86 percent saying that they strongly disagreed.
Then how are we to understand unpleasant
NDEs in relation to the religious understand of hell? This, as Atwater points
out, takes a deeper investigation because the phenomenon of the NDE is vast in
scope and has more important implications than most of us are willing to admit
or accept.
The first fact is that NDE research finds a
vide difference in the content of NDEs based on cultural differences. These
differences are most evident in pleasant or heaven-like experiences where
meetings with religious figures are clearly defined by the religious background
of each individual. However, while we do find unpleasant or hell-like
experiences in most or all cultures, there is still a difference in the
cultural content of these negative experiences.
If we look at a couple of Western
experiences of hell we can see how the content fits with a classical Western
view of hell. The first person explains that, “I felt I was in Hell. There was
a big pit with vapour coming out and there were arms and hands coming out
trying to grab me.”
Also in Fenwick’s book The Truth in the Light, another person gives this longer testimony:
It
was really like all the images I had ever had of Hell. I was being barbecued. I
was wrapped in tinfoil, basted and roasted. Occassionally I was basted by
devils sticking their basting syringe with great needles into my flesh and
injecting my flesh with the red-hot fat. I was also rolled from side to side
with the long forks that the devils used to make sure that I was being well and
truly roasted.
In both testimonies of hell we have the
classical content of a Western hell and while the first person tells us she
felt she was in hell the last person even explains that it was like all the
images he had ever had of hell.
If we look at non-Western experiences of
hell we will quickly see that the content is different. Todd Murphy published a study of Buddhist NDEs in
1999 where he looked at 11 Thai cases. While there was a higher frequency of
distressing elements in these NDEs, it is very clear that they have specific
cultural content as in ten cases people met Yama, the Buddhist Lord of Death or
his servants that are called Yamatoots.
One
account reveals that, “Yamatoot told him that he had to be judged. He then
found himself in front of Yama, the lord of the underworld.” Another person
explains that,
I looked and saw that they were
Yamatoots. One of them spoke to me saying "we've come to take you to
hell". I said "I'm not going", and I tried to escape. I turned
and repeated that I was not going to go to the house of Yama.
Secondly, besides specific cultural content
we also find that fact and perception can be very different. Not only cultural
conditioning, but also the perception of each individual can play a major
factor in how the NDE is experienced. Atwater explains that, “Invariably an
attack of some kind would take place in hellish scenarios or a shunning, and
pain would be felt or surges of anxiety and fear.” But; “Amazing as it may
seem, I noticed that the same scene that one individual considers wonderfully
positive another may declare negative or horrific.”
There is
evidence to suggest that not only cultural concepts of hell play a factor in
the perception of hell, but also one’s environment may play a factor. First,
the finding of higher rates of unpleasant NDEs among people with distressing
states of mind at the moment of death, such as e.g. suicide attempts, seems to
suggest that our mental state has an impact on the negative content of the NDE.
Also higher frequencies of negative experiences have been found in other
cultures, such as in African cultures where a belief in woo doo and a sense of
being “bewitched” was predominant.
Also very
interestingly, a German study that compared East German NDEs with West German
NDEs happening before the fall of the wall, found a huge difference in
distressing experiences. Where the East German NDEs had a frequency of negative
experiences of 60 percent, the West German study only found 29 percent.
So, we
find that not only is there is difference in cultural content but there also
seems to be a difference in perception of what is experienced as distressing,
and that both mental state and environments may affect the negative experience.